Fiscal and macroeconomic effects of the constitutional amendment to the spending ceiling (No. 95/2016)
Abstract
This paper investigates the effects of the Constitutional Amendment No. 95/2016 on fiscal management, economic growth, and families’ welfare. It uses a dynamic general equilibrium model with heterogeneous agents. The model includes congestion in the government’s offer of consumer services to households and public capital to firms. Considering the population growth, the freezing of public spending proposed by EC 95/2016 could bring a strong reduction in the level of services offered to families, especially in the poorest strata. Alternative policies that allow the variation of public investments accompanied by compensation for losses by the poorest would not only generate allocation efficiency gains and improvement in the redistribution of income, but also the reversal of bottlenecks and sustained economic growth. The product of the economy would grow 9.2%, after 10 years of the EC 95/2016, driven by public investment.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 José Weligton Félix Gomes, Ricardo Antonio de Castro Pereira, Arley Rodrigues Bezerra, Francisco Germano Carvalho Lúcio, Francisco Assuero Monteiro Saraiva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
