TENSIONES Y DIALÉCTICA EN EL ARRAIGO CAPITALISTA DE UNA RED INDUSTRIAL: UN ANÁLISIS VISUAL EN RED DE LA COOPERACIÓN EN LA INDUSTRIA PAPELERA HOLANDESA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25113/farol.v11i31.7925Palabras clave:
Cooperación en red, Centralidad de puente, Empresas transnacionales, Análisis visual de redesResumen
Aunque es bastante habitual aplicar el análisis de redes para estudiar la cooperación y/o la competencia en los estudios de economía organizativa con el fin de esbozar estrategias para la creación de redes eficaces en términos de innovación, rendimiento u otros aspectos, este artículo pretende, en cambio, señalar las tensiones y dialécticas subyacentes en la incrustación capitalista de las redes industriales. El análisis visual de la red de la industria papelera neerlandesa ilustra cómo cambió la cooperación ante las crecientes sospechas y la persecución real de las prácticas colusorias. Mientras que, por un lado, los esfuerzos por fortalecer la cooperación interorganizacional para aliviar las presiones competitivas a veces se ven amenazados por el creciente dominio de las empresas transnacionales en la red, el estudio también muestra cómo las pequeñas y medianas empresas ocupan posiciones estructurales ventajosas de puente entre los conglomerados densamente conectados de la red.
Citas
Ahuja, Gautam (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
Bélanger, Jacques & Edwards, Paul (2006). Towards a political economy framework: TNCs as national and global players. In Anthony Ferner, Javier Quintanilla & Carlos Sánchez-Runde (Eds.). Multinationals, institutions and the construction of transnational practices (pp. 24-52). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Benson, J. Kenneth (1983). A dialectical method for the study of organizations. In Gareth Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method: strategies for social research (pp. 331–346). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Benson, J. Kenneth (1977). Organizations: a dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 1-21.
Bonanno, Alessandro, Friedland, William H., Llambi, Luis, Marsden, Terry, Moreira, Manuel B., & Schaeffer, Robert (1994). Global post-Fordism and concepts of the state. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 4, 11-29.
Borgatti, Stephen P. & Foster, Pacey C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
Borgatti, Stephen P. & Halgin, Daniel S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168-1181.
Bouwens, Bram & Dankers, Joost (2010). The invisible handshake: cartelization in the Netherlands, 1930-2000. Business History Review, 84(4), 751-771.
Bratsis, Peter (2014). Political Corruption in the age of transnational capitalism. Historical Materialism, 22(1), 105-128.
Buch-Hansen, Hubert & Wigger, Angela (2010). Revisiting 50 years of market-making: the neoliberal transformation of European competition policy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(1), 20-44.
Bumaga BV (2017). About us. Retrieved on December 29, 2022 from https://www.bumaga.nl/over-ons/.
Burt, Ronald S. (1992). Structural holes. The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pulp and Paper Online (2005). Jefferson Smurfit Group and Kappa Packaging announce agreement to merge. Retrieved on December 29, 2022 from https://www.pulpandpaperonline.com/doc/jefferson-smurfit-group-and-kappa-packaging-a-0001.
Chappin, Maryse M., Hekkert, Marko P., Meeus, Marius T. H., & Vermeulen, Walter J. V. (2008). The intermediary role of an industry association in policy-making processes: the case of the Dutch paper and board industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(14), 1462-1473.
Commission of the European Communities (2005). Case No COMP/M.3935 - JEFFERSON SMURFIT / KAPPA. Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2005). Belgium. Retrieved on December 29, 2022 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32005M3935.
Consultancy.nl (2017). Fortaleza Capital benoemt SolidPack topman Dirk Schut tot partner. Retrieved on December 29, 2022 from http://www.consultancy.nl/nieuws/13942/fortaleza-capital-benoemt-solidpack-topman-dirk-schut-tot-partner.
Davies, Jonathan S. (2011). Challenging governance theory: from networks to hegemony. Bristol: Policy Press.
Decuypere, Mathias (2020). Visual network analysis: a qualitative method for researching sociomaterial practice. Qualitative Research, 20(1), 73-90.
Drahos, Michaela (2001). Convergence of National Competition Laws. the cases of Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands. National Policy Adaption of the 1999 Proceedings of ESCA Sixth Biennial International Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ehrich, Martha E. (2020). Neither new nor heterarchic. Inter-organizational networks throughout the history of the Dutch paper and board industry. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nimegue, Netherlands.
Evans, Mark (2001). Understanding dialectics in policy network analysis. Political Studies, 49(3), 542-550.
Faria, Alexandre (2004). Theorising networks from a critical realist standpoint: the discovery of power and contextual issues within and outside ‘networks’. In Stephen Fleetwood & Steve Ackroyd (Eds.). Critical realist applications in organization and management studies (pp. 211-233). London: Routledge.
Gerybadze, Alexandre & Reger, Guido (1999). Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28(2-3), 251-274.
Granovetter, Mark (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
Hwang, Woochang, Cho, Young-R., Zhang, Aidong, & Ramanathan, Murali (2006). Bridging centrality: identifying bridging nodes in scale-free networks. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, New Yor, USA.
Jessop, Bob (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, Bob (1994). Post-fordism and the State. In Ash Amin (Ed.). Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 251-279). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Jessop, Bob & Sum, Ngai-L. (2006). Beyond the Regulation Approach – putting capitalist economies in their place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
KCPK. (2018). Werkwijze. Retrieved April 23, 2018, from http://www.kcpk.nl/over-ons/werkwijze/.
KCPK. (2017). Algemeen. Retrieved March 4, 2017, from http://www.kcpk.nl/algemeen.
Konings, Jozef, Van Cayseele, Patrick, & Warzynski, Frederic (2001). The dynamics of industrial markups in two small open economies: does national competition policy matter? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(5), 841-859.
Krippner, Greta R. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173-208.
Lundan, Sarianna M. & Mirza, Hafiz (2011). TNC evolution and the emerging investment-development paradigm. Transnational Corporations, 19(2), 29-52.
Marsh, David & Smith, Martin J. (2000). Understanding policy networks: towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies, 48(1), 4-21.
Medarov, G. & Tsoneva, J. (2015). The New European investment plan: a critical analysis of financial instruments and large infrastructure financing. Counter Balance, Challenging Public Investment Banks. Retrieved on December 29, 2022 from https://counter-balance.org/uploads/files/Reports/Flagship-Reports-Files/2015-New-EU-Investment-Plan.pdf.
OECD (1999). Netherlands – the role of competition policy in regulatory reform.
Orbis. (2017). Controlling shareholders VPK Packaging Group. Aalst: VPK Packaging Group.
Overbeek, Henk (1993). Restructuring hegemony in the global political economy: the rise of transnational neo-liberalism in the 1980s. London: Routledge.
Overbeek, Henk, Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan, & Nölke, Andreas (Eds.). (2007). The transnational politics of corporate governance regulation. London: Routledge.
Powell, Walter (2003). Neither market nor hierarchy. In Michael J. Handel (Ed.). The sociology of organizations: classic, contemporary, and critical readings (pp. 315-330). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Staatsblad (1997). Besluit subsidies economie, ecologie en technologie. Brussels: Staatsblad.
Tregenna, Fiona (2011). Manufacturing productivity, deindustrialization and reindustrialization. United Nations University (UNU) – World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER). (Working Paper, n. 2011/57).
Uzzi, Brian (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan & Horn, Laura (2007). The transformation of corporate governance regulation in the EU. In Henk Overbeek, Bantiaan Van Apeldoorn, & Andreas Nölke (Eds.). The transnational politics of corporate governance regulation (pp. 99-119). London: Routledge.
Varga, Joseph J. (2013). Breaking the heartland: creating the precariat in the US lower rust belt. Global Discourse, 3(3-4), 430-446.
Wigger, Angela (2015). Enhancing ‘competitiveness’ in response to the European crisis. In Johannes Jäger & Elisabeth Springler (Eds.). Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures: critical political economy and post-keynesian perspectives (pp. 114-130). London: Routledge.
Wigger, Angela & Buch-Hansen, Hubert (2013). Competition, the global crisis, and alternatives to neoliberal capitalism: a critical engagement with anarchism. New Political Science, 35(4), 604-626.
Williamson, Oliver (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Martha Emilie Ehrich
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Assume-se que em qualquer das modalidades de contribuições aceitas pela Farol – Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade, ao submeter um trabalho, o(s) autor(es) se reconhece(m) como detentor(es) do direito autoral sobre ele e autoriza(m) seu livre uso pelos leitores, podendo ser, além de lido, baixado, copiado, distribuído, adaptado e impresso, desde que seja atribuído o devido crédito pela criação original. Em caso de aprovação do trabalho para publicação, os direitos autorais (inclusive os direitos de tradução) são exclusivamente do(s) autor(es).
Os autores devem concordar com os seguintes termos relativos aos Direitos Autorais:
a. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
b. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
