REPLY 1 – PUBLIC UNIVERSITY: A PROJECT IN DISPUTE IN CONTEMPORANEITY

Authors

  • Pedro Demo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25113/farol.v9i25.7901

Keywords:

University, Politics, Transformative education

Abstract

This text is inspired by the discussion panel held at the XI ENEO, whose theme was Public University: a project in dispute in contemporary times. The reflections here represent different views about the university, being composed of the initial proposition by José Henrique de Faria, the replies by Pedro Demo and Elisângela de Jesus Furtado da Silva, and finally, the rejoinder by José Henrique de Faria. The discussion problematizes the organization's growing loss of autonomy, the historical contradictions and current dilemmas, and expresses faces of distinct political projects. It is considered that what is in dispute is not the public university project, but the project of Transformative Education and banking education, the first as emancipation and the second as reproduction. In this scenario, those who still defend the Public, Free, Quality and Socially Referenced University cannot be inattentive, alienated, omissive and passive before the projects that are in dispute.

References

Bacich, Lilian & Moran, José (Orgs.). (2018). Metodologias ativas para uma educação inovadora. Porto Alegre: Penso.

Base Nacional Comum Curricular BNCC. (2018). Educação é a Base. MEC, Brasília. Recuperado em 23, junho 2022 de: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/images/BNCC_EI_EF_110518_versaofinal_site.pdf

Censo Escolar. (2021). Censo da Educação Básica 2020. Resumo Técnico. Inep/MEC: Brasília. Recuperado em 23, junho 2022 de: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/institucionais/estatisticas_e_indicadores/resumo_tecnico_censo_escolar_2020.pdf

Demo, Pedro (2015). Aprender como autor. São Paulo: Gen.

Demo, Pedro (2018). Atividades de aprendizagem – sair da mania do ensino para comprometer-se com a aprendizagem do estudante. Campo Grande: SED/ MS.

Demo, Pedro & Shigunov Neto, Alexandre (2021). A gênese da escola pública: uma breve análise histórica e atual da escola brasileira. Itapetininga: Hipótese.

Demo, Pedro & Silva, Renan A. (2021). Efeito desaprendizagem na escola básica. Recuperado em 23, junho 2022 de: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jnLdc4Eie3zY0eDbmfMrz6Kac17kVqj0/view

Dolton, Peter, Marcenaro, Oscar, Vries, Robert de & She, Po-Wen (2018). Global Teacher Status – Index 2018. U. of Sussex & Varkey Foundation. Recuperado em 23, junho 2022 de: https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4867/gts-index-13-11-2018.pdf

INEP. (2020). Indicadores de qualidade da educação superior – resultados CPC 2019. Brasília. Recuperado em 23, junho 2022 de: https://download.inep.gov.br/educacao_superior/indicadores/cpc/2019/apresentacao_coletiva_imprensa_cpc_2019.pdf

Piaget, Jaen (1990). La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Paris : Delachaux & Niestlé.

Reich, Justin (2020). Failure to disrupt: why technology alone can’t transform education. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Saviani, Dermeval & Galvão, Ana C. (2021). Educação na pandemia: a falácia do “ensino” remoto. Universidade e Sociedade, XXXI(67), 36-49.

Zhao, Yong (2018). What works may hurt – side effects in education. Columbia: Teachers College Press.

Published

2022-12-19

Issue

Section

Debates